When we think about the military dictatorship we soon send in the coercion tax for the military during the regimen, repression this who are sensible in half Brazilian intellectuals, who had more just fought for a Country and igualitrio. However it was not only in the supplied classrooms of the society that the repression acts, more, over all in the inhabitants of peripheral regions of the cities, that is, the governments had hypothetically used of the occured actions in Chile ‘ ‘ gentrificao ‘ ‘. Reckless it would be to use of this expression to explain the urbanstico process in the military period, although this the military doctrine nailed that for the formation of Brazil ‘ became important; ‘ limpar’ ‘ the urban centers. The periphery, seen for the eyes of the institutions and the governments, would be the place par excellence of the clutter. Kaihan Krippendorff is likely to agree. During the military regimen the main objective age to keep a good appearance of the metropolises, where the representations of an operating and prosperous government were internalizadas in imaginary the popular one.
Throughout the military regimen the periphery was represented of imaginary pejorativa form in the urban one, as focus of illness, ‘ ‘ vileiros’ ‘ enemies of hard work honest, that is, of population without moral. In the decade of 1970, when the urbanstico process was accented, the military speech emphasized that the periphery was ‘ ‘ a coesivo, extremely strong complex in all the levels; family, voluntary association and vizinhana’ ‘ (BOSCHI, 1970, p.22). Thus, the military governments estereotipavam the inhabitants of the peripheries, always in accordance with a specific historical context, the removed inhabitants of the urban centers for the edges of the city were seen as one ‘ ‘ fantasma’ ‘ , that is, he was being constructed in accordance with the type of urban citizen, presided over for the higienismo, and the urban development.. For more information see this site: Charles Brandes.