SOMWA

However, one day they will be gotten rid of its superstitious beliefs. Dropbox brings even more insight to the discussion. In the words of the author: intelligence is always in evolution, almost always in progress, and, for this reason, our institutions and laws are citizens the fluctuations of the intelligence of the 5 man If to the side of the institutions and the laws to place its beliefs, the facts will become clearer and its explanation will present for same itself 6. Therefore, in the first part of the workmanship if defines the beliefs, the way to think and to act of the old peoples. Such peoples gave singular value to the death and to the soul, they believed that the death was only one change of state, the soul continued to live in the land close to the livings creature, from there the importance them tombs and rites fnebres, since, for continuing to live underneath of the land also they conserved the suffering and well-being feeling. This is a very interesting point of the text, therefore as Fustel is this the origin of the necessity of sepulture for the man. According to this belief that one that not possua tomb not possua dwelling, therefore was not happy, thus feared more the privation of sepulture of what the proper death.> Is necessary to clarify this important situation because without never making the close correspondence established between the old beliefs and the constitution of the families will be understood Greeks and 7 Romans the relative beliefs to deceased, together with the cult due to these deceased, had constituted the old family and had authorized most to it of its 8 rules. the family is an organized State, a society that if is enough to proper itself 9. However, this family was well bigger who the modern family, remembers the author. Thus, the city-state appeared as resulted of this type of familiar organization, the city was a great family.

The historical image is the product of the imagination of the historian, and the necessary character of this image this on a priori existence of the imagination. Thus workmanship of the historian to differentiate of the romancista workmanship only in the measure where the image created for the historian is considered as true. In the Thirties and forty that the presentismo knew in the United States, its bigger development; this development that Robinson had promised one to it ' ' history nova' '. The importance of the American presentismo if over all relates with the fact to have been developed mainly for eminent historians as Charles. the Beard.

It is not treated, therefore of philosophical speculations in the sort of that Croce and Collingwood practised, but of the point of view elaborated for historians in direct relation with its inquiries. The American presentismo comes directly from Croce whose ideas had been implanted in the United States, for a philosopher of the influence of John Dewey, therefore it has an undisputed kinship of ideas between the presentismo of one and the pragmatismo of another one. Dewey relative judgments and things that we can observe in the gift (documents, monuments and etc.) are based only on in judges who are the one result election operated in function of definite necessities. They are thus relative in relation to the problems and at the same time, it is always the product of a definite gift. History this thus always in relation with a definite gift that supplies the principles of the election and assumes the responsibility of the facts of the past. From there the conclusion, each gift has its past, each gift rewrites history.

However Schaff considers our essentially negative judgment; all the appreciation demands a reference system and alone it can be made from chosen oppositions. If to reject the presentismo, although to approve the orientation of its criticizes directed against the positivismo, making from determined philosophical positions, because what we reject, is necessarily the philosophical bedding of this doctrine. In first place, Schaff denies falling again on the idealismo, necessarily, on the subjective one of the doctrine of the presentismo. To the scale sewing press the historical process the objective which Schaff that to relate ours knowledge and the objective truth, fulminadas in the damaged ways of the subjetivismo; the classic definition of the truth loses in all this adventure its citizenship and its reason of being. For the marxist, the positivismo, as well as the presentismo, is unacceptable in the same way, but each one for you defend different for them, the question is not to know which of these two positions is errnea or next to its proper points of view; both it are equally strange, exactly if it can approve the advanced critical arguments for one against the other. The presentismo is placed, therefore in subjective positions, even so underlining, with reason the social conditioning of the citizen that knows. Not contradictory the theoretical problem that consists of only catching in one current theoretician and the thesis on considered history as an objective process who if produced in the past and that we study, the thesis on the faced knowledge not as a contemplation, but as an objective and active process. At last, controversies between the presentismo and the positivismo had clarified a little these problems, supplying to us it its contribution theoretician-historical. But these same questions constitute the objective of studies equally and inquiries in you considerably discipline scientific that, although indirectly, you influence, our Metaphysical reflection.

To look at stops backwards and perceiving that the objective of the conquest of the property was reached of these men and women a joy, the victory feeling. Ours andanas in the Nesting makes possible in them to capture images and narratives that in had supplied material to them the production of this text. To understand the history of the nesting of inside of the context, from the proper actors and authors, of these pioneers, who had not only planned, but that they had been there and they occupied the land, being firm in this fight of the one conquest ' ' handspan of terra' ' , as well as of people who had contributed directly with the nesting, as the Foot. Edgar, profa. Salete, amongst others, was a sufficiently significant experience. The narratives had been being constructed to the step that we looked for to make to emerge the souvenirs of the events that had marked the life of these people in this construto description-social. When leaning over on the analysis of the caught memorial signals in the narratives of seated () of the Nesting Good Village Hope went if fortifying the certainty of that the readings would have to be most careful possible; that it fit before the writing on the history of the nesting some revisions, in the direction to prevent precipitated judgments. This research had for objective to know and to divulge the history of the Nesting Good Village Hope from the captation of presented memorial signals by means of the seated and seated narratives of that had participated of the occupation process and that there they remained, making to fulfill its function social. For materialization of this research we opt for the methodology of verbal history, for believing that the same one allowed in them to mapear, through an analysis you say of them of actors – protagonists of the Good Village Hope – the necessary memorial signals for the tessitura of the writing of the history of this nesting.